AI in cardiology: ChatGPT leads, but not ready to replace doctors Technology

If you wanted to find restaurants, sports scores, or other useful information, you’d search Google, where that information would be easily accessible. By incorporating the company’s knowledge graph, Google has made Gemini useful for more than generating quick, mediocre copy. In the future, that could pay off even more, especially as the company continues to integrate Gemini with Android. ChatGPT screwed over the kosher eater by suggesting crab and recommending cheese be served alongside meat.

Given that neither model was challenged, I upped the ante by writing out the following argumentative paragraph that might appear in a Reddit comment and asked the AIs to evaluate its logic. « Along with our low-code development platform, we also provide services for creating fast screens and rapid applications in terms of software development, » he said. Noting that they provide infrastructure that can be used in the military as well as an AI assistant, Mendi said they can also serve as a software development assistant to optimize software development processes. However, the advantages of Gemini are a clear reminder that AI is a field Google dominated long before it became a popular craze.

• One of the things AI companies would like you to use their products for is problem solving, so it’s important to see how both Gemini and ChatGPT handle it when presented with a real headache of a logistical challenge.
• To ensure the robustness of their findings, the authors applied comprehensive statistical analyses, including Kruskal–Wallis tests, Dunn’s post hoc tests, Kendall’s W, and weighted kappa metrics.
• I chalk the repetition up to the fact that Snarf’s has several locations, but, regardless, none of them should be on the list because they don’t offer this sandwich.
• I added some relatively well-known regional slang, asking if the previous recipes were prepared « the ocky way, » meaning in the style popularized by Arab bodega chefs.
• (You may remember news stories several months prior to the launch of ChatGPT about an internally tested AI model that convinced one Googler it was sentient).
• When I asked both AIs why they couldn’t write a haiku, ChatGPT apologized and wrote another not-haiku, but Gemini gave a response that seemed to confirm my theory.

The AI chatbots had drastically different approaches to creative copy

To determine which company’s flagship chatbot was the best for everyday use, I set out to create a gauntlet of challenges that would put them through their paces, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each. Looking at everything from conversational abilities to problem solving acumen, I came to some surprising conclusions and found myself shocked more than once. Oh, and for this comparison, only the free versions of both AIs were tested, which means these results do not reflect Gemini Ultra or GPT-4. In separate posts on X (formerly known as Twitter), Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis and OpenAI’s Member of Technical Staff Alexander Wei announced that their chatbots achieved gold medal-level scores in 2025 IMO. Both Gemini and ChatGPT solved five out of six problems and scored 35 out of 42 marks, which is considered enough for a gold medal. While Gemini Deep Think model was used for the competition, OpenAI used an unnamed experimental research model for the Olympiad.

AI in cardiology: ChatGPT leads, but not ready to replace doctors

I was feeling hungry, so to test this capability for both ChatGPT and Gemini, I asked them for a classic, NYC-style bacon egg and cheese sandwich recipe. Both responded with nearly identical recipes, but I preferred Gemini’s response because it included cooking times as well. Gemini competes directly with OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and Google has some major advantages over its younger competitor. Most importantly, Gemini can connect to your Google account, which allows you to do things like ask it to search your email or consult Google Maps.

Gemini shows Google is a force to be reckoned with

He said that everyone uses open-source chatbots such as Google’s Gemini or OpenAI’s ChatGPT frequently in their daily lives, but using them as a corporate tool is not very feasible, especially in terms of data security. While both ChatGPT and Gemini have their truly impressive moments, both fail often enough to make them unreliable without plenty of additional fact-checking and verification. Even though there is a way to make Google Gemini’s AI responses more precise, the friction is often enough of a hassle to just do whatever it is you need done yourself, rendering them rather useless. With that said, once you understand the strengths and weaknesses of each, it’s clear that Google and OpenAI are frontrunners in this race. If you’re not paying for either service, and if you don’t want an AI smart assistant, neither app offers much value compared to the web version, so the edge goes to ChatGPT for having a more natural, snappy conversional style.

What was considered when comparing ChatGPT and Gemini?

On the other hand, those who require clinical precision may find ChatGPT more compelling for certain tasks. The problem with Gemini for Android, as of this writing, is that you cannot use it as a standalone app and you can only embrace it as a very downgraded phone assistant. Over on iOS, Gemini is tucked into a tab inside the Google app, making it much more appealing since you won’t need to give up Siri to use it. ChatGPT, meanwhile, is the same on both platforms, with an app that essentially gives you the desktop experience, along with the ability to have voice conversations with it. That feature went viral when the app launched as people experimented with putting two ChatGPT-equipped phones side by side and making them converse with one another. If you’re a paying customer, you can also access OpenAI’s GPTs, which are third-party programs that tap into the GPT API.

Saying that Türkiye’s institutions possess vast amounts of data, Mendi stressed that infrastructure needs to be created to interpret this data and make it ready for AI. Still, I wanted the website to pop on the page more, so I submitted a frustratingly vague request to « make it colorful, » and both bots did so. ChatGPT added a solid green background to the header and footer, while Gemini took things in a more flamboyant direction with a pastel gradient that looks way better in my subjective opinion. Apart from MAIN, Mendi noted that Havelsan has developed many different AI models with many different parameters, including ones with nine billion and 70 billion parameters and ones with even higher numbers.

Germany paves way for delivery of Eurofighter jets to Türkiye: Report

It is also multimodal, able to process and create outputs based on not only text but also images, video, audio, or code. Google also boasts about the model’s scalability and has released it in tiers from Nano to Pro and even Ultra. Top executives at Google have said the goal is to make the model as capable and general as possible.

Chat GPT showed better logical reasoning

As a result, I ultimately deemed conversation and natural language nearly a tie between the two. Google was long thought to have had a massive head start in the AI race, having focused a lot of its internal research and development on the field long before the release of ChatGPT. (You may remember news stories several months prior to the launch of ChatGPT about an internally tested AI model that convinced one Googler it was sentient). In late 2022, OpenAI, which had previously been a nonprofit organization until 2019, released an LLM chatbot that quickly became viewed as the herald of a new arms race in the tech industry. Previous versions of GPT had been viewed as mere curiosities due to their limited functionality, but ChatGPT, based on GPT-3.5, was a leap forward. The public was taken aback at its ability to converse about a seemingly endless range of subjects while generating fluid, natural sounding text.